Beneficiary Claim against lawyer for the trustee fails

Trust and probate litigation  has a tendency to “deplete” any estate. The reason for this is pretty obvious. Attorneys fees. This is one of the major reasons why we would prefer to settle cases if at all possible. This is why parties, when they are acting rationally, will calculate how much it would cost to litigate something, and settle with that data in mind.

When it is the trustee that is doing the litigating, it is the assets of the trust that is being depleted. The beneficiaries obviously, are not going to be happy about this. other than timely settle a case (if this is even in their power) what else can they do?

 Well one plaintiff decided that they should sue the attorney for the trustee. Not their own attorney,  but the attorney for the trustee because the beneficiary felt litigation was “unnecessary.”  Dolinger v. Murphy 2015 Cal. App. Unpub. Lexis 6344 

One remedy available to defendants is the Anti-SLAPP  statute.   A SLAPP  is a strategic lawsuit against public participation, and we are against that.  This would be say a corporation  filing a lawsuit against environmental organization that is against the corporation polluting.  being a lawyer representing a client is  petitioning activity and is definitely covered under this statute.

It seems somewhat on however that somebody would go through the trouble of filing a lawsuit against  somebody else’s lawyer. However, one of the interesting things about this case is the plaintiff was in pro per. She was  not represented by an attorney  and did this on her own.  There was an amicus curiae attorney  that evidently took  her side however.  The attorney in this case represented himself.  

 I do believe one thing that a lot of attorneys are cognizant of is the fact that these cases are incredibly taxing on beneficiaries.    It is obviously best to have a good estate plan, marry well and not too often, have children that get along.   Much of the time, expect some depletion of the estate through litigation. That is just a sad fact.

Comments are closed

Ahmed Shaikh, Attorney at Law, provides legal advice and representation for clients in communities throughout Orange County, Los Angeles County and Riverside County in Southern California, including Tustin, Irvine, Santa Ana, Costa Mesa, Anaheim, Anaheim Hills, Fullerton, Brea, Yorba Linda, Placentia, Westminster, Fountain Valley, Huntington Beach, Newport Beach, Lake Forest, San Clemente, Rancho Santa Margarita, San Juan Capistrano and Buena Park.

Copyright © 2014 by Ahmed Shaikh, Attorney at Law. All rights reserved. Disclaimer | Site Map